Pages

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

WNW: A clear and concise explanation.

Really, it's so obvious when it's explained like this.  Why can't we have taxes and healthcare illustrated in so plain a manner?





Tip of the hat to McThag for finding this gem.


UPDATE:  I found a transcript of the technobabble!

For a number of years now, work has been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely conceived idea of a transmission that would not only supply inverse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors, but would also be capable of automatically synchronizing cardinal grammeters. Such an instrument is the turbo-encabulator.
Now basically the only new principle involved is that instead of power being generated by the relative motion of conductors and fluxes, it's produced by the modial interaction of magneto-reluctance and capacitive diractance.
The original machine had a base plate of pre-famulated amulite surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two spurving bearings were in a direct line with the panametric fam. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented.
The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots of the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a non-reversible tremie pipe to the differential girdle spring on the "up" end of the grammeters.
The turbo-encabulator has now reached a high level of development, and it’s being successfully used in the operation of novertrunnions. Moreover, whenever a forescent skor motion is required, it may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration.
It's not cheap, but I'm sure the government will buy it.

2 comments:

  1. Cool! I was already familiar with the retroencabulator, so it's good to learn more about its cousin, the turboencabulator!

    ReplyDelete
  2. If we were to combine the two, would it be a turbretroencabulator? Or a retroturboencabulator?

    ReplyDelete