Monday, August 25, 2014

Much Ado About JPFO

Which is not to say that I think the organization titled Jews for the Preservation of Firearm Ownership is "nothing"; not at all.  I just have difficulty coming up with good article titles at times...


Anyway, for those of you who may not have noticed, there is currently a deal being made whereby the Second Amendment Foundation will acquire JPFO.   This has pissed off two bloggers whose opinions I respect, Claire Wolfe and Nicki from The Liberty Zone blog, who not incidentally are writers for JPFO (or were, in Claire's case; she resigned in the wake of this revelation as an act of protest).

On the other hand, Oleg Volk -- another blogger whose opinion I respect -- has said  "I see this as a good development. SAF can give JPFO greater reach."

And on the gripping hand, David Codrea, whom I also respect, is maintaining a guardedly neutral stance about the whole affair.

http://jpfo.org/images08/tshirt/outline-on-black-640.jpg

I'm not really sure what to think here.  I definitely don't want JPFO's unique voice to be silenced or become generic, but I also see benefit in greater funding and resources.

I'm not telling you what to think, either. I just encourage every one of you to read as much about it as you care to, come to your own decision, and let the leadership of JPFO where you stand.

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Gunblog Variety Podcast

In the wake of my first ever YouTube video (which I actually filmed a week after I recorded my part here), I continue my bid to create an Erin Palette Media Empire by appearing on Sean Sorrentino's podcast in my role as a Blue Collar Prepper.


Give it a listen -- Sean's assembled quite the cast:

Show notes are available on the GunBlog VarietyCast blog page.

Friday, August 22, 2014

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Don't You Think She Looks Tired..?

     In 2006, for the first time in decades, The Doctor toppled a government on television, bringing Prime Minister Harriet Jones's Golden Age to an end by whispering six words into the ear of her aide. The six words “Don't you think she looks tired?” A moment symbolic of any small act that creates a crack in the foundation of a much larger idea. Why am I bringing this up? I promise, it has relevance. 

     Now before we get too far, I should acknowledge and admit something. I don't talk personal politics often. I feel I probably should, as I have friends that range from far Left to far Right, liberal libertarians to conservative republicans to socialist democrats. I play my own political hand close to the chest, though, most of the time. In my younger, more extreme days, I was an old-school pinko lefty. For years I pretty much identified as communist, and spent a great deal of time hurling not-well-thought-out insults at the far Right. I've railed against bigots and religious zealots, and thrown things at corrupt politicians. I've flirted with charges of disrupting the peace and inciting riot. And I did most of this in the American Deep South. In retrospect, I consider myself lucky I haven't been disappeared down a dirt road or swampy hollow. I've mellowed in my days, though, learning the hard lesson that you can indeed have friends that hold differing political views (something I feel a great many need to learn), but this is the reason I am so dead-set against Social Justice (capital S, capital J) activists and their antics these days. Those causes I fought for, and still believe in, are causes that they're doing more harm than good to. Causes that I was fighting for before they were co-opted by people with louder, less rational voices.

     Modern Social Justice is the squat-house built on the shaky foundation of Third-Wave Academic Feminism. And don't get me wrong, I'm not against the good that Feminism has done for the world. The first wave, with its women's suffrage (even if they really were only fighting for white women – one battle at a time, I suppose), voting rights and property ownership, and the second-wave with its sexual liberties, workplace equality, and other noble goals really made some positive change, even if we have to ignore some of Solanises and Dworkins that these eras might have spawned. Third-Wave Academic Feminism, though it started strong by addressing and bringing attention to important subjects like rape laws, domestic violence, and childcare, has since had no such clear goal, and therefore has floundered a bit in the modern day, lashing out at whatever it can reach. This lack of focus may have been what spawned the Social Justice (again, capital S, capital J) trends of the last decade or so. Identity politics mixed with cultural Marxism, but completely disregarding class struggle in favor of branding entire groups of people oppressor and oppressed without consulting them first.

     So why I'm bringing all of this up right now is that recently a hashtag and picture campaign called #WomenAgainstFeminism has sprung up, a sort of reaction to negative stereotypes (justified or otherwise) of modern Feminism. This has, of course, also had a knee-jerk reaction of criticism from feminist sources ranging from the standard “oh you just don't understand feminism” to the absurd “these women are simply puppets of men.” The latter I find especially entertaining and appalling, as it's basically stripping women of their agency to disagree, something that any first- or second-waver would find detestable, I'm sure. In fact, the barrage from either side has gotten loud enough that major news outlets have gotten wind, and in their typically expected modern sensationalist manner, have started asking the question “Do we even still need Feminism?” I remember a CNN segment where a female presenter brought on two other female journalists, and asked the question. The first agreed with the presenter that absolutely it was, but the second one's started with “Weeelll....” to the abject horror of the presenter and other journalist.


     Whether we do or not, it's six little words that attacked the foundation that the Social Justice Warriors have built their flophouse on. If, as a culture, the sacred cow (no insult intended there) that Feminism is has started to be publicly doubted, perhaps identity politics as a whole will start to shake apart. While I hope none of the good works are undone, I can only hope that we can move into a period where open discussion is once again encouraged over shutting people's voices out because of the circumstances of their birth, whatever those circumstances may be, by shouting the word privilege at them, or blaming all the troubles in the world on an ethereal, ill-defined conspiratorial organization that may as well be the Illuminati. There's been entirely too many people of late that feel they can enact positive social change by tweeting obscenities or writing an angry blog-post shaming someone for an accidental slip of the tongue, and not enough attention paid to people pushing for actual change.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Let's settle this once and for all, shall we?









So, a bit of history.  Two weeks ago, this conversation happened:



Therefore, I present to you the aforementioned obscure piece of Sisters of Mercy fanart.








Let that be a lesson to you.


(Editor's Note:  I have no idea what lesson I'm being taught.  I never said I didn't believe Von. 

And the fact remains that it IS botched German.  :P  )

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Traveller Tuesday: Troop Berthing

Previously, I talked about staterooms aboard ship and how they're smaller than college dorms.  Today, I'm going to talk about berths for sailors and marines, and how their sleeping areas are even smaller than that.


In High Guard, it is mentioned that
Staterooms or quarters must be provided for the entire crew. The captain of the ship must be provided with an individual stateroom, as must the commanding officers of each section and the commander of the ship's troops. All other personnel on military vessels must be provided with the equivalent of half a stateroom each.
Half a stateroom. That's 2 dtons each. Luxury, says I, because I have seen (and slept in) the marine quarters aboard the USS Guam, a helicopter carrier, and any non-NCO gets at most half a dton for personal space.

This arrangement here?  That's about 3 dtons total.
http://www.businessinsider.com/a-tour-of-the-guided-missile-destroyer-uss-barry-and-its-crew-2012-8?op=1
This is not from the Guam; this is from the USS Barry, an Arleigh Burke class Destroyer. (Click on the link above to check out the photo essay; it's fascinating.) The Barry is actually smaller than the Guam, but the bunk arrangements were about the same, which tells me this arrangement is fairly typical for the US Navy.

Yes, I am fully aware of the rule in Traveller that not all of the dtonnage allocated to staterooms actually goes into the rooms themselves, and that a good chunk of it is actually spent on common rooms. That's fine. But the cramped nature of these ships, and the similar cramped nature of Traveller deckplans, indicates two things to me:
  1. Traveller ship design was influenced by people who actually served in the Navy. None of this "condo in space" thing that Star Trek has. 
  2. Sure, the officers get nice staterooms (and that's where the majority of the common space comes from), but the enlisted ratings get stacked like cordwood. 

Slightly less cramped are the Crew Rest Compartments aboard jumbo jets.  I never knew these existed until this link was posted on a Traveller board that I frequent, and for some reason this just tickles my sense of exploration and love of hidden compartments.  (That link is also worth following; not only are there more great photos, but there are also some amazing YouTube videos of CRCs aboard different planes. Some of them look downright luxurious!)

But while some of the rest areas are easily a dton per bunk (and therefore likely 2 dtons allocated per crewmember)....

http://tinyurl.com/n8sosj8

... you'll note they're STILL stacked like cordwood:



What's rather amazing is how sci-fi the renders of the area look when compared to the mock-ups:



In conclusion:  They're packed like sardines in real life, so don't feel like you need to hew faithfully to the rules as written. It's all an abstraction regarding "gameable space" anyway; the rules require that tonnage for crew is paid for, because crew has an effect on how the ship plays in the game, just like turrets and ammunition and fuel and engines.  The game does not require the designer allocate tonnage for landing gear, or life support, or gangways, or even toilets, because those things aren't gameable space -- from a rules perspective, they're just assumed to exist because their existence has no mechanical effect upon the ship.

In other words, don't sweat the realism, and you can stack your marines and ratings three deep.

Monday, August 18, 2014

Monday Gunday Product Reviews: SGM Tactical 50-round Glock Drum

So, a while back I mentioned that I had acquired a 50-round Glock-compatible drum (still available for $40 + shipping at Mississippi Auto Arms).

I've shot it several times since then and, let me tell you, it's a hoot. Let me break it down for you.

Things It Is

  1. Fun. More ammunition is always better, right? 
  2. Reliable. So far I haven't had a single jam or misfeed while using it, and I'm not the only reviewer to feel that way -- this Video Blogger has similarly good things to say about its reliability. 
  3. Efficient.  It holds an entire box of round nose 9mm. 
  4. Rugged.  It's made of Dupont glass-filled polymer with steel innards. Admittedly, I haven't beaten mine all to hell, but I've dropped it and banged it against things and it still works. I don't know if I'd take it to war, but I have no worries about using it in a home defense scenario. 
  5. Easy to load.  There's a nifty ratchet system that works each round down into the drum. Work the ratchet to depress the follower; insert a cartridge; release the ratchet; repeat.  There's no spring to wind as the ratchet does that for you. 
  6. Inexpensive.  Did I mention it's only $40?  Last I checked, 33-round stick mag from Glock was around $33.  Of course, I also see this drum going for a LOT more than $40 at other online stores, so if you want one, I'd suggest you get one now. 

Things It Is Not

  1. Fast to load.  I timed how long it took me to load it -- not rushing, just a "Ho hum, gonna load this mag" speed, and it took me 2 minutes 25 seconds to load 50 rounds. You aren't going to be reloading this in a fight. Your fingers get pretty tired, too.
  2. Easy to transition. This drum is three times the width of a pistol, and extends a good 3-4 inches from the magazine well. If you're doing lots of  tactical pie-slicing or switching from carbine to pistol, the drum IS going to get in the way and you WILL bump it against something:  your thigh, the hallway corner, the heads of small children or pets...
  3. Easy to gauge. By that I mean there's no way to visually inspect how many rounds you have left. You have to keep count. 
  4. Easy to tell when you're empty.  This is the single biggest drawback of this drum magazine:  there is no slide-lock to indicate when you're out of ammo. Combined with the above, that's pretty serious. 
  5. Easy to clean. Sure, you can swab the feed lips and the stick part of the mag without problem, but if you want to clean and lube the mechanism, you're going to be unscrewing a LOT of Torx-head screws. 

http://www.mississippiautoarms.com/glock-9mm-50-round-drum-sgm-tactical-p-3217.html

Things Neither Here Nor There


  1. Weight. It's not as heavy as it looks, but fully loaded it still weighs about 3 pounds. 
    • Inserted into my Sub-2000 and supported by two hands and a shoulder weld, it's barely noticeable weight-wise. 
    • It's more noticeable when plugged into a pistol, but I didn't consider it a big deal as the weight is exactly in line with the grip. Funny enough, the extra weight did seem to mitigate barrel rise somewhat. 
    • You definitely don't want to carry it in a pocket, though. Its weight plus its size (above) make it awkward to cart around. 
  2. Inattention. If you aren't paying attention when you're loading it -- say, you're watching TV -- it's entirely possible to pull the ratchet down more than is necessary such that when you insert a cartridge, it tumbles nose-first. This can sometimes result in that cartridge being pushed the wrong way (primer facing forward, bullet facing back) when the ratchet is released. 
  3. Insertion. If you insert this into your firearm with the slide or action locked back, there's no trouble. But if you want to insert it with the action or slide forward, you're going to have a bit of difficulty as the rounds aren't going to depress enough.  What you must do in that instance is work the ratchet slightly to make the top round go down enough that the drum can lock in place. 

Is It Worth Getting?

To my mind, absolutely. At the very least it's a fun range toy; at most it brings a lot of bang to a self-defense scenario. However, if you are going to go that latter route, here are my recommendations:
  1. Don't get more than one per gun.  Seriously, there's no easy way to carry it on your body, and prying it out of a cargo pouch takes more time than it's worth. And again, note how there's no slide-lock when empty, and if you're loading with the action forward, you either have to fiddle with the ratchet or lock the action back before you can insert the drum. 
  2. Carry stick mag backups.  Just in case you run out of ammunition, or the drum misfeeds. God forbid you ever need more than 50 rounds to defend yourself, but fortune favors the prepared. 
  3. Train with it.  As I said, it's bulky, and you're liable to bump it into things, or knock stuff over with it. 
That said, I enjoy mine immensely and I'm glad to have it. 

The Fine Print


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial- No Derivative Works 3.0 License.

Creative Commons License


Erin Palette is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.