I am vengeance. I am The Night. I am
Spoilers.
I love the
Batman: Arkham series. I
have since I first played
Arkham Asylum, the beginning of the series. I
was wary of them at first, as licensed games have a long and storied
history of being completely shit. Super-hero based titles in
particular. One of my favourite super-hero films is
Iron Man, and I
was psyched when I found a clearance copy of
Iron Man: The Game. Sadly, it was one of the worst games I've ever played.
|
Seriously how do you mess this up? |
Not since
Goldeneye 007 on the N64 had there been a
good licensed game, and
Asylum
sparked the return of good licensed games, followed up with High
Moon's
Transformers: Cybertron titles and
Deadpool. Even now, the
genre hasn't recovered from the damage done, but at least there are
good licensed games out there, and we owe it mainly to
Arkham Asylum.
Arkham City, the sequel, may have
been lacking the tightly focused narrative of the original, but it made up for it in scale of playable area and the mountains of sidequests,
expanded roster of villains, and innovations in gameplay. The prequel
game
Arkham Origins (while not made by Rocksteady) is easily the
worst of the series, but still an outstanding game. It innovated very
little (expanding mainly on the Detective Mode in such a way that
Rocksteady recognized and used in
Arkham Knight), but it told a great
story with mainly b-team villains. A mobile game,
Arkham Origins: Blackgate wasn't necessarily a great game, but it wasn't terrible either, and was ported to PC and consoles later.
It's previously been fashionable to
bash the
Arkham games for their treatment of women, primarily
Catwoman. Despite being a playable character (both free-roam and
story) and given her own motivations, agency, and the chance to rescue
Batman, the game was still branded sexist because common street thugs
called her 'bitch.' I'm honestly not sure how people who are locked
up in a city-sized prison can be expected to treat one of the two women
publicly making their residence known in said city-prison
respectfully, but apparently the words of minor villains are the
lesson the developers wanted us to take away from the game. Not that
Catwoman is a badass capable going toe-to-toe with dozens of hardened
criminals and Two-Face himself, but that she's a bitch. You've got me
there.
For the most recent outrage,
Arkham Knight is coming
under fire
for its treatment of Poison Ivy, mainly that she's a
scantily clad damsel in distress. I'll grant you exactly one thing,
she
is scantily clad. But Ivy's so far mutated from
baseline-human that her brain doesn't process human modesty the way
the rest of us do. Is that an excuse? Maybe, but it's one that works
in the context of the story. But that's as much leeway as I'll give
those claims.
My only assumption can be that the people
writing these articles haven't played the game, but only seen a few
short, selected clips. The claim is that she's kidnapped with a gun
held to her head by a goon that she should be able to take out
herself, Batman rescues her only to take her again and throw her in a
cell, and use her when she's useful again, as a 'power-up.'
Let
me tell you what really happens: Ivy is involved, as a party
with agency, in a meeting of villains called to pool their resources
to take out the Bat. Exercising that agency, she refuses, and is
somehow rendered unconscious. It's not explained how, but she wakes up
in a chamber with a gun to her head, at which point Batman enters the
picture, beats up a dozen guys outside of said cell. Scarecrow gasses
her and goon, but it only affects goon due to her natural immunity to
toxins. She proceeds to smash his head into the glass of the chamber,
and then walk out under her own power. She explains the situation to
Batman before casually tossing him off of a building with her vines.
Naturally, being Batman, he's waiting for her when she exits the elevator. Deciding
the fight isn't worth the trouble, she allows herself to be arrested
and taken to the GCPD. Batman later realizes he needs a way to purge
Scarecrow's toxin and releases her from custody. She then takes
control of a giant root system underneath Gotham and wreaks havoc on
the Arkham Knight's tank division while Batman provides a modicum of
covering fire. The game's mission objectives even reflect this by instructing you to "work with" Ivy, not "protect" Ivy. Finally, she sacrifices herself to purge Scarecrow's toxin from
Gotham in a heroic redemption.
Reducing Ivy's role in the story of
Arkham Knight to 'damsel in distress' is downright insulting. Insulting to the character, to her creators, the developers of the game, and her fans. She
plays a major part, and Gotham would have been lost halfway through
the game if it weren't for her.
Catwoman's part is being criticized as well, but that one's only partially valid. It's true, Riddler has her. She's got a bomb collar on, and Batman must complete challenges for keys to the bomb collar.. only some of those challenges involve taking direct control of Catwoman. And she's in this situation in the first place because of a character trait that's been present in Catwoman from day one: She's greedy. Riddler paid her to do a job, and double-crossed her by fitting the collar on her in the process. She even straight-up tells Batman that she doesn't want her situation to act as a motivation for him.
I'm only going to say this about Harley
Quinn: She's wearing more clothes in every game and still you
consider her sexualized.
|
Don't you go there, Kotaku.. don't you... you went there. |
As for my
favourite character in all of Batdom, Barbara Gordon...
Kotaku, you go back and finish the goddamned game. And when you get to the part where Barbara Gordon looks
Scarecrow in the eye and says “You don't scare me”, you come back
and you apologize. And you replay those parts where you track her movement, where you hear about the soldiers that were taken out by a 'cripple in a wheelchair with ninja sticks.' Where you find the scene of the humvee she managed to crash by macing the driver, and how she crawled away until someone put a warning shot in the pavement a foot from her head, only to leave Batman a way of tracking her location without a trained and highly skilled villain noticing. And don't you
ever call Barbara Gordon a 'professional victim' again. A professional victim is someone that milks a tragedy (real or imagined) for sympathy. Barbara Gordon took that tragedy and turned it into a legacy, becoming one of the most important characters not only in the Bat-titles, but in all of DC.
The Ivy criticism made me sigh. The insult to Barbara Gordon made me genuinely angry.