Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Not Just Wrong, But Fractally Wrong

No doubt many of you have seen my article which appeared in The Federalist. The original title was more punchy, and the editors eliminated a lot of my introduction and bona fides. In both cases I can understand why, but I love my words and hate to see them altered. Therefore, I present my original draft for those who are interested in seeing what was changed.

Not Just Wrong, But Fractally Wrong
By Erin Palette with research done by W. E. Beard

My name is Erin Palette, and I am the Founder and President of Operation Blazing Sword, a national charity founded in the wake of the Pulse Terror Attack to teach the basics of firearm operation to queer people who want to learn how to use a gun for self-defense but do not feel safe going to a gun store or shooting range for training. We have over 1300 volunteers across the country, in every state and in every major metropolitan area, as well as in Canada and Europe.

I am also the National Coordinator for the Pink Pistols, a nationwide shooting group that was founded in 2000 under the principle “Armed queers don’t get bashed.” There are currently over 50 Pink Pistols chapters across the country and in Canada.

Both organizations teach anyone, but especially queer people, how to shoot and then we tell others that we have done so. This makes me the leader of the largest pro-gun queer group — or, if you prefer, the largest pro-queer gun group — in the country if not the world.

With these qualifications, I was asked to give my opinion on David Hogg’s tweet of January 26, where he said the following:
While I was asked for rebuttal, I instead offer refutation. Unlike Mr. Hogg, I shall cite sources for my statements. Not only will this prove his statement is wrong, but also completely careless in its inaccuracy, and therefore callous to the injustice done to those people whom he is claiming to champion.

To begin, Mr. Hogg speaks of “centuries of gun violence prevention”. I have no idea how he arrived at this number, and I doubt anyone else does, either. If there is a history book that tells the story of how non-white queer women and transwomen started a gun control movement in 1820 then I would very much like to read it.

I specify the year 1820 because Mr. Hogg’s use of the plural for century indicates a minimum of two hundred years, and the United States will be only 244 years old this July 4th. In the 44 year period between 1776 and 1820 our country was nearly always at war, including but not limited to the Revolutionary War, the Franco-American Naval War, the Barbary Wars, the War of 1812, and the Creek War, and during that time our nation still relied upon militias composed of volunteers with privately-owned rifles and pistols. [1] Restricting arms only to those citizens who belonged to a standing army would not only have severely hampered a fledgling America’s struggle for existence both on home soil and abroad, but gun control as we know it today would have been an alien concept to American colonists and early citizens.

At that time, the British East India Company — which was a private company answerable to stockholders and not an organ of the British government — had the largest armed force in the world, consisting of multiple armies with cavalry and artillery assets, as well as fleets of heavily-armed merchantmen supplemented with warships. [2] Furthermore, the Constitution of the United States has written into it a framework for Congress to write letters of marque and reprisal, which granted private citizens the ability to hunt ships of hostile nations for the good of the country. These private citizens did this with privately held warships armed with naval-scale cannons. [3]

Given just these two examples, it is clear that the highest levels of military hardware were available to private owners, and that small arms — including those suitable for military use — were therefore ubiquitous. So ubiquitous were they that states and municipalities would fine able bodied men for not having weapons or participating in militia musters. There were even laws where you would be fined for traveling or attending church unarmed. [4]

However, while the colonists and early citizens of the United States were well-armed and saw virtually no restrictions on what arms they could own or when they could carry or use them in a peaceful manner, this was not true for all inhabitants of the land. Many people of color were brought to this country as slaves, and as property, they had no rights. Furthermore, free persons of color and Native Americans were often prevented by law from owning firearms. [5] Such gun control as Mr. Hogg champions would have hurt those fighting against slavery. Abolitionists were highly unpopular and threatened with violence or worse; the Reverend Elijah Parish Lovejoy, publisher of the abolitionist newspaper The Saint Louis Observer, was murdered by a pro-slavery mob who shot him before destroying his new printing press. [6] Members of the Underground Railroad needed to protect themselves from law enforcement and bounty hunters enforcing fugitive slave laws, and so were often armed. The most famous example of these is Harriet Tubman, who carried a pistol for self defense while escorting runaway slaves to freedom. [7]

While the 14th Amendment eliminated some of this discrimination, many additional laws were passed to keep people of color, the poor, and other “undesirables” from owning or carrying arms as part of the many Jim Crow laws of the time. Some of these statutes have survived to the present day, such as the North Carolina Pistol Purchase Permit which requires that an applicant be of “good moral character” despite the fact that, and I quote, “The term ‘good moral character’ is not defined in our statutes nor is there a case specifically on point as to what constitutes good moral character for purposes of a pistol purchase permit.” [8] Needless to say, being a person of color was ample reason to deny a permit under these circumstances. Most famously, in 1950 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr, applied for an Alabama concealed weapon permit after receiving death threats. He was, of course, denied. [9] In the 1960s, California’s Mulford Act banned the open carry of firearms as a direct reaction to members of the Black Panthers patrolling minority neighborhoods while visibly armed. [10]

More recently, 19 states maintained sodomy laws which, until their overturn by the Supreme Court in 2003, could arrest and prosecute people for “unethical sex acts” i.e. consensual sex between queer people, the punishment for which would often be severe enough to make the convicted a person prohibited from owning firearms. [11] Even today there is nothing to stop racist, sexist, or homophobic/transphobic police chiefs from denying people permits because of their race, religion, gender presentation or sexuality in jurisdictions with may-issue gun laws.

In conclusion, not only have I disproved Mr. Hogg’s ridiculous claim, I have proved that all gun control disproportionately affects queer people and people of color.

Or, put another way: Mr. Hogg isn't just wrong, he's fractally wrong: not merely wrong, but wrong on every scale, with pockets of small wrongness concealed within larger wrongness; wrong from any analytical viewpoint, with each piece self-similarly wrong.


[1] Metesh, T. Logan. (2/2/2020) Arms historian, Conversation with Erin Palette.

[2] Bryant, Gerald (1978). "Officers of the East India Company's army in the days of Clive and Hastings". The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History,

[3] "The Constitution of the United States", Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11.

[4] Cramer, Clayton E. (2016) “Colonial Firearms Regulation”.

[5] Cramer, Clayton E. (Winter 1995) “The Racist Roots of Gun Control”, 4 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 17, 20

[6] “Elijah Parish Lovejoy Was Killed By a Pro-slavery Mob". Library of Congress.

[7] Clinton, Catherine (2004). “Harriet Tubman: The Road to Freedom”. New York: Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 0-316-14492-4.

[8] North Carolina Sheriff’s Association (2016). “Most Common Firearms Law Questions”.

[9] Winkler, Adam (2011). “MLK and His Guns”. The Huffington Post.

[10] Simonson, Jocelyn (August 2015). “Copwatching”. California Law Review.

[11] "Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)". Justia Law.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Fine Print

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial- No Derivative Works 3.0 License.

Creative Commons License

Erin Palette is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to