Showing posts with label Virtual gender-bending. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Virtual gender-bending. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Thursday, January 29, 2015
The Thor Question
I encourage the reader to look back on that article, as it's relevant today when we take a look at the major factor that I could not, at the time, cover: Will it be any good?
Three months or so have passed since
the book launched, and three issues have been released that I've been
able to obtain and read. To summarize what's happened, during a
battle on the moon, Nick Fury (who'd recently stolen the secrets of
Uatu the Watcher) whispered something in Thor's ear that stopped him
in his tracks and made him drop his hammer. Thor had been on the moon
, basically sulking and trying to lift Mjolnir unsuccessfully.
Becoming broody and unresponsive, his mother Frigga (filling in for
Odin) is naturally concerned for him, and Odin himself returns and
attempts to lift the hammer, failing in this as well.
The Asgardians finally leave the moon
at the end of the first issue, and an unidentified woman approaches
the hammer, says to herself that there must always be a Thor, and
lifts it easily, empowering her with Thor's abilities and covering
her in Thor-esque armour. About this time, Malekith (disappointingly
looking nothing like Christopher Eccleston) launches an attack on an
undersea research base owned by Marvel corporation Roxxon with a
legion of Frost Giants after beating up a Mjolnir-less Thor, chopping
his arm off, and wearing it as a scarf for the next few issues. The
woman now wielding the hammer returns to Earth and attacks the Frost
Giants as they make their way up from the ocean floor to a floating
Roxxon base.
| Sir Not Appearing In This Book |
So the questions are: Have my concerns
been laid to rest and, more importantly, is it any good?
To the first: Not completely. I will say that in three issues so far, she has not once referred to herself as Thor, and no one has positively identified her AS Thor. As I explained previously, I'm perfectly OK with Thor being somehow deemed not worthy to hold the hammer, and if anyone could convince him that he's not it's Nick Fury (with or without Watcher knowledge). I'm still not sure why Odin of all people can't lift it, and that had better be explained as well, as he's the one that enchanted Mjolnir to begin with. What I wouldn't be ok with is literally calling this woman Thor, as she's clearly not. Thor is the man's (god's?) name. It's not a title or an office like “Captain America” or “Iron Man.” You don't put James Rhodes in an Iron Man suit and call him Tony Stark, you call him War Machine. You don't give Bucky Barnes the Red/White/Blue and call him Steve Rogers, you call him Captain America. I'm perfectly ok with either a) turning Thor into a woman or b) giving the status of God(dess) of Thunder to another person, but you don't just give someone's name away. It's a bit disrespectful, and so far that hasn't happened, but I hear in a future issue it might. As an addendum to the points I've made previously, I'm perfectly fine with a woman taking over a traditionally male character, if it's done right. Renee Montoya's been one of my favorite supporting Batman characters, and when she took over the role of The Question, I was thrilled. DC did not disappoint there. But we didn't start calling her Vic Sage. She was still Renee Montoya, just in The Question's mask/suit.
To the first: Not completely. I will say that in three issues so far, she has not once referred to herself as Thor, and no one has positively identified her AS Thor. As I explained previously, I'm perfectly OK with Thor being somehow deemed not worthy to hold the hammer, and if anyone could convince him that he's not it's Nick Fury (with or without Watcher knowledge). I'm still not sure why Odin of all people can't lift it, and that had better be explained as well, as he's the one that enchanted Mjolnir to begin with. What I wouldn't be ok with is literally calling this woman Thor, as she's clearly not. Thor is the man's (god's?) name. It's not a title or an office like “Captain America” or “Iron Man.” You don't put James Rhodes in an Iron Man suit and call him Tony Stark, you call him War Machine. You don't give Bucky Barnes the Red/White/Blue and call him Steve Rogers, you call him Captain America. I'm perfectly ok with either a) turning Thor into a woman or b) giving the status of God(dess) of Thunder to another person, but you don't just give someone's name away. It's a bit disrespectful, and so far that hasn't happened, but I hear in a future issue it might. As an addendum to the points I've made previously, I'm perfectly fine with a woman taking over a traditionally male character, if it's done right. Renee Montoya's been one of my favorite supporting Batman characters, and when she took over the role of The Question, I was thrilled. DC did not disappoint there. But we didn't start calling her Vic Sage. She was still Renee Montoya, just in The Question's mask/suit.
| Seriously, go read Crime Bible: Five Lessons In Blood. DC can do diversity well. |
As
for the Goddess of Thunder's identity.. that's still not been
revealed. I can tell, through dialogue, that it's not one of my top
three picks for female replacements for Thor, though. There's an
internal monologue portrayed through thought bubbles that this woman
is clearly not used to having superpowers, which rules out Valkyrie,
Carol Danvers (Ms/Captain Marvel), and Angela, and a scene in which
she's isolated from the hammer briefly and starts to lose her powers
confirms this. And as for that dialogue.. it's very cringey. It
honestly feels like they're half-assing Spider-man's insecure
internal monologueing for whoever this is, and it makes the character
feel a little unlikeable.
In short, the book's a bit dull, and it feels like it's riding off the mystery and controversy of a female Thor without actually bringing a good story, and that's kind of disappointing. As much as I was dead-set against what Marvel seemed to be doing, I was still holding out hope they'd surprise me. So far, I haven't been. So far I've been kinda bored, but I'm going to stick around and see how it turns out. Avengers: Age of Ultron is only a few months out now, and I'm going to be very cross if they dump this and go back to Thor Thor after such a lackluster performance.
In short, the book's a bit dull, and it feels like it's riding off the mystery and controversy of a female Thor without actually bringing a good story, and that's kind of disappointing. As much as I was dead-set against what Marvel seemed to be doing, I was still holding out hope they'd surprise me. So far, I haven't been. So far I've been kinda bored, but I'm going to stick around and see how it turns out. Avengers: Age of Ultron is only a few months out now, and I'm going to be very cross if they dump this and go back to Thor Thor after such a lackluster performance.
| Besides, we've already had a proper female Thor. And she was a goddess to begin with. |
I think it's telling that, for a review of this book, I've spent so little time actually talking about what happens in this book. I'm hoping it picks up soon, because it's got a lot of ground to cover before AoU comes out.
Thursday, July 17, 2014
OH LAWDY THOR'S A WOMAN
![]() | |
| Have a new Salem |
*Here, and I was worried a topic would not present itself for me to write upon this week..*
So the other day it was announced the Marvel's Thor was now going to be a woman. Well, that was the announcement, but as you'll see in the linked press release, it's actually a bit more of a complicated situation than that.
Thor is being judged unworthy (which has happened before) and the hammer is going to be wielded by someone else (which has also happened before). For a while, a horse alien held Mjolnir. Captain America, Storm, a few artificial life forms, and others have held the hammer in regular continuity. Outside of regular continuity, Superman, Rogue, Wonder Woman, and one of the various Spider-men have held it. Magneto even used it for a while (relying on his magnetic powers rather than being worthy of it). So I want to make it perfectly clear that I'm OK with someone else holding the hammer. I'm even OK with someone else headlining the Thor books. Some of the best stories were told when Hercules was headlining Hulk while he was off-planet being a gladiatorial emperor, and I can't think of something that would be more awesome than Valkyrie carrying around Mjolnir and headlining Thor for a while.
Marvel's made a lot of (gasp)
progressive changes that have resulted in some interesting outcomes.
Hispanic Spider-Man over in the Ultimate U. The Fearless Defenders
book. Ms Marvel being promoted to Captain Marvel, along with the
flightsuit/mohawk look. Countless other little changes and seeds that
show they've been playing a long game to make their worlds more
diverse and interesting, and I applaud them for it. They've managed
to make a lot of little changes that don't feel like “tokens,”
telling good stories and making changes in the world that feel
natural, all the while DC Comics has been trying to play catch-up and
falling flat on their faces. Just like the real world, change is
slow, painful, and gradual, but it feels natural when done that way.
You can't change a world overnight without the entire thing
collapsing.
So with all of this in mind, I do
actually have a problem with Thor being a woman, the way they've
framed it. As I understand it, and these are from the words of the
creative team, Thor is not turning into a woman. If Thor were
turning into a woman, I'd be more OK with this, as he's a demigod.
The rules are, always have been, and always should be, unclear on
what limitations that can be placed on a demigod's physiology. No,
this is a character that is in Thor's life, idolizes him, looks up to
him, and when Thor is judged unworthy, he is stripped of his power,
his hammer, and his name, and it is given to her instead. In
my eyes, this is a total disrespect to both characters. You're taking
a character's very birth name from him, the name given him by his
mother and father (coincidentally, demigods themselves), and you're
giving it to someone else. Not even Loki, who slept with a horse, gave birth to a baby horse, and brought about Ragnarok,
ever had his own name taken from him. You're literally taking his
identity away.
And here's the part where I don't understand why more people concerned with diversity are upset. Why Joss Whedon and TheMarySue and all the other female-centric-viewpoint-friendly outlets aren't rioting. You're taking a woman, erasing her previous identity, and giving her a new one, based on an existing character. There was speculation for a bit that a previously existing female character, likely one of Marvel's super-powered blondes, would take over. Honestly, being a fan of both Valkyrie and Ms/Captain Marvel (likely candidates to stand in for Thor, based on appearance and power levels), I am certainly hoping that is not the case. Both of these characters have a pretty rich history and stand on their own merits, and to have all of that taken away from them and just have “THOR” pasted over it would be pretty insulting. There's a lot of really awesome pre-existing female characters in the Marvel U that I'm now worried about, because I want them to keep existing as who they are, and not having the identity of Thor pasted over theirs.
Of course, this is all speculation. It could be a cynical publicity stunt. It could all be reset to status quo inside of 2 years. It could turn out to be a fantastic story that all makes sense once its taken in context with the events surrounding it. But from the information they've given so far, it's just.. kinda worrying. From some of my previous posts, I've made it clear that I enjoy stories with female protagonists. I've been reading some of Marvel's female characters for close to 20 years now. I want to see more and better things done with them, but one thing I don't want to see is a characterized game of matroyska dolls where someone like Carol Danvers or Emma Frost is swallowed up by another character.
And here's the part where I don't understand why more people concerned with diversity are upset. Why Joss Whedon and TheMarySue and all the other female-centric-viewpoint-friendly outlets aren't rioting. You're taking a woman, erasing her previous identity, and giving her a new one, based on an existing character. There was speculation for a bit that a previously existing female character, likely one of Marvel's super-powered blondes, would take over. Honestly, being a fan of both Valkyrie and Ms/Captain Marvel (likely candidates to stand in for Thor, based on appearance and power levels), I am certainly hoping that is not the case. Both of these characters have a pretty rich history and stand on their own merits, and to have all of that taken away from them and just have “THOR” pasted over it would be pretty insulting. There's a lot of really awesome pre-existing female characters in the Marvel U that I'm now worried about, because I want them to keep existing as who they are, and not having the identity of Thor pasted over theirs.
Of course, this is all speculation. It could be a cynical publicity stunt. It could all be reset to status quo inside of 2 years. It could turn out to be a fantastic story that all makes sense once its taken in context with the events surrounding it. But from the information they've given so far, it's just.. kinda worrying. From some of my previous posts, I've made it clear that I enjoy stories with female protagonists. I've been reading some of Marvel's female characters for close to 20 years now. I want to see more and better things done with them, but one thing I don't want to see is a characterized game of matroyska dolls where someone like Carol Danvers or Emma Frost is swallowed up by another character.
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Justine, or Sometimes I'm A Woman.
I'm sure you've all heard the theories and dismissals: - They're probably all a bunch of pervs, pretending to be girls online.
- Well, who wants to stare at a dude's ass for hours on end?
- They just want to play dress-up with skimpy armor!
Of all the games I play, the ones that hold a special place in my heart are the ones where you can create your own characters. I'll concede the point that there are a glut of 20-to-30-something, short-brown-haired white dudes as protagonists in video games, as there are in many forms of media, so my interest is always peaked at seeing a good, strong female lead. Give me a Faith Connors, a Jill Valentine, the new Lara Croft any day for a dash of variety in storytelling. If there's an option of male or female character, I'll actually feel more comfortable playing as the female character. There's a good reason for that, too.
![]() | |
| Ark Hunter Justine |
![]() |
| Commander Justine Shepard |
I think Commander Justine Shepard, Biotic Vanguard and XO of the Alliance frigate Normandy SR1 was the first time the name appeared. And appeared is probably the most apt term. I've never known a Justine in real life, and I can only think of a handful of pop culture folk that have the name, none of which had a particularly heavy influence on me. But Justine Shepard formed a more solid image in my head, with the first few defining traits. Red hair. Hard features, pale blue eyes, and a shotgun. Justine, from Vault 101, was the next time she appeared, and gained a touch more solidity. She'd be willing to help those who approached her, slow to anger, and a bit of a loner. Justine the Courier for the Mojave Express would try the diplomatic approach, but the moment you drew on her, she'd put you down. When she went back into space on the Normandy SR2, she fell in love with an old friend; he had reach, she had flexibility.
Due to differences in game engine and artistic style, her looks do vary a little, but there are some things that never change. Red hair, blue eyes, almost always human (thanks, Kingdoms of Amalur, made me play a freakin' elf). Some way of getting right up in the enemy's faces, be that a cloaking device, biotic charge, or shotgun loadout. Sensible armor and/or clothing. She'll negotiate, but she won't back down. She's fiercely loyal to her crew (except dumb muscle-heads that defy orders and wreck her shuttle), but wary of strangers.
![]() |
| Courier Justine, probably the most developed image of them all. |
![]() |
| Justine, Dragonborn |
![]() |
| Justine of the 3rd St Saints |
Now, for those of you worried, I fully acknowledge that she's not a real person. She's merely a viewpoint in my mind that gets a lot of exercise. She has, however, grown past simply being a literary tool or a way to see through the eyes of another person. Either way, I take some comfort in the fact that I'm not picking my protagonists just to see some tail waggling in my face for hours on end.
(In case you're interested, the games referenced here include the Mass Effect series, Fallout 3 and Fallout: New Vegas, Saints Row The Third, Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, and Defiance)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The Fine Print
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial- No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Erin Palette is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.








